I saw Star Trek again today with Amy S. from high school- I originally saw it Thursday night- and yet again it was awesome. I think it was even better the second time around because I got to appreciate the storyline more and the acting, without having to use the brain to try and understand stuff. If you have not seen the movie, you must, immediately, get to a movie theater. It's soo good. I don't know if I want to get into the TV show again. Don't know if it'll be as good without this adorable cast. The only actor I didn't find that adorable was Karl Urban as McCoy- I always found his face to be a smooshed up version of Hugh Jackman and Harry Connick Jr. But apparently his acting really resembled the original guy from the TV series and was really good. In any case, the only flaw I think I can name about the movie is Winona Ryder as Spock's mom- it's so random since she's 6 years older than Zachary Quinto, and her aged makeup just looks so fake and horrible. It's so obvious that either she begged JJ Abrams for the part since she's doing nothing else or for some reason he took pity on her and gave her it.
Anyways, best parts upon the second viewing:
( Cut for spoilers )--
Anyways, in other news, I've been reading another one of Richard Yates' books, Young Hearts Crying. Richard Yates is the guy who wrote Revolutionary Road, one of the best books I've ever read, and also was one of the inspirations behind Mad Men, incidentally, one of the best TV shows I've ever watched. He basically is now remember as being
the writer to completely capture and define the '50s- a critical essay I was reading about him compared him and the '50s to F. Scott Fitzgerald and the Jazz Age, and how the two are inseparable when you try and think of one without the other. And Yates wrote Revolutionary Road during the '50s too, which is just so impressive, that he was able to pinpoint and distill the age he lived in while he was living it and not in hindsight. I was just thinking of that and how rare that would be to become that sort of writer. Like for me, I would love to write a novel that said something profound and meaningful about the 2000s, but I don't know if I have truly even lived enough or seen enough to do such a thing. If I lived in the '20s I probably wouldn't be chilling with the Hemingway/ Fitzgerald crowd, I'd probably just be leading a humdrum life and missing out on the true age defining culture and all that, and I worry that I'm doing that now. But then I think, I live in New York, what could I be missing out on.